woocommerce-paypal-payments
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/compass/compassfirstlaw.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114woocommerce-paypal-payments
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/compass/compassfirstlaw.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114woocommerce-paypal-payments
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/compass/compassfirstlaw.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114woocommerce-paypal-payments
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/compass/compassfirstlaw.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114woocommerce-paypal-payments
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/compass/compassfirstlaw.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114zn_framework
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home4/compass/compassfirstlaw.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Melinda Burns, January 30th, 2019, Noozhawk\u00a0<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n Fifty years after the Jan. 28, 1969, oil spill in the Santa Barbara Channel, the region is on the verge of another upheaval \u2014 the wholesale removal of aging oil infrastructure.<\/span><\/p>\n Seven platforms out of 19 in the channel have shut down operations and will likely be removed, starting in the 2020s, together with their piers, pipelines and onshore processing plants in Carpinteria, Goleta and Gaviota.<\/span><\/p>\n The oil companies themselves will bear most of the cost, billions of dollars overall. At the same time, the state Legislature has been forced to budget tens of millions because former owners have disappeared into history or declared bankruptcy.<\/span><\/p>\n The first task at hand is to plug dozens of offshore oil wells with cement, an expensive and time-consuming task<\/span><\/p>\n This year off Summerland, the State Lands Commission will be working on so-called legacy\u00a0oil wells that were drilled in the late 1890s and are leaking oil onto the beach.<\/span><\/p>\n Off the Rincon this winter, Chevron Corp. will begin plugging wells at platforms Gail and Grace. And off Goleta, ExxonMobil will start plugging two wells in the surf zone at Haskell\u2019s Beach, and 30 offshore wells at Platform Holly, starting in February and April, respectively.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s an unusually happy moment to see change,\u201d said Anne Wells, planning manager for the city of Goleta. \u201cIt\u2019s something our entire community is witnessing. We\u2019re moving in the direction of a coastline that\u2019s free of our 1930 oil and gas history, into a new era of a natural coastline. I have to pinch myself.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Untested waters<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n Platform Holly, installed in state waters two miles off Goleta in 1966, is slated to be decommissioned within five to seven years, state reports show; no platform of comparable size has ever been removed on the Pacific Coast.<\/span><\/p>\n And at least six more offshore oil platforms \u2014 Harvest, Hidalgo, and Hermoso off Point\u00a0Conception, Habitat off Carpinteria, and Grace and Gail off the Rincon and Ventura County \u2014 may be removed around the same time. These platforms range in age from 32 (Gail) to 53 years old (Holly).<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cOil\u2019s been here for a long, long time,\u201d said Fred Shaw, a Carpinteria councilman who remembers the spill of 1969. \u201cWe\u2019re used to looking at the rigs, but wouldn\u2019t it be nice if they went away? The majority of the town would just prefer that that oil development wasn\u2019t here.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Decommissioning, though, will be a gargantuan task. The platforms were installed in water hundreds of feet deep, they weigh thousands of tons, and onshore disposal options are limited. The question of whether to leave the platform legs in place underwater \u2013 the \u201crigs-to-reefs\u201d option \u2013 will have to be hashed out during environmental review.<\/span><\/p>\n Bringing a specialized vessel to the channel from Asia or the Gulf of Mexico to lift the platforms out of the water is a daunting proposition. The state estimates that the mobilization alone will cost operators between $11 million and $49 million before the vessel even begins work. Multiple operators may want to piggyback and reduce their costs.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cWe could be looking at some fairly significant removals,\u201d said John Zorovich, deputy director of county Planning & Development in the energy, minerals and compliance division. \u201cI think that\u2019s the direction we\u2019ll probably be going in the next 10 to 15 years.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Plugging the oldest wells<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n For residents such as Nora McNeely Hurley, it\u2019s about time. From her home on the bluffs above Summerland Beach, she can see oil leaking into the surf zone from the legacy,\u00a0or \u201corphaned,\u201d wells that were abandoned after\u00a0the drilling frenzy of more than a century ago.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cYou see dolphins and whales and birds, and people in and out of the water,\u201d Hurley said. \u201cLittle do they know how polluted it is. Directly out from our house are two wells leaking that deliver an iridescent film over the beach. It kills me it\u2019s been going on for such a long time.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Last year, at a cost of $1.2 million, State Lands plugged a legacy well that was spewing globs of black oil onto the sand. The two leaks that Hurley spotted had first been observed in 2016, and now they\u2019re visible again. A stench of oil hangs in the air.<\/span><\/p>\n Because of the complexities of plugging legacy wells, it may be possible to work on only one per year, said Sheri Pemberton, a spokeswoman for State Lands. The agency also needs to conduct a geophysical study off Summerland Beach, she said.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cThere are seeps along that stretch of coast that may become more active as we plug and abandon leaking wells,\u201d Pemberton said. \u201cWe are committed to doing our best to ensure that oil on the beach is not coming from a legacy well.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n In Goleta, the two wells on Haskell\u2019s Beach near The Ritz-Carlton Bacara are remnants of the Ellwood Oil Field from the 1930s, before drilling at the water\u2019s edge was banned. After these wells are plugged, Exxon will remove the rusting rectangular caissons around the wellheads.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cThe day they actually start demo-ing down the caisson walls is going to be a big day for celebration for this community and beyond,\u201d said Wells, Goleta\u2019s planning manager. \u201cThese wells are right in the surf zone, and we saw what happened in Summerland.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Passing the buck<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n According to a Jan. 10 State Lands report to the Legislature, Exxon expects to spend as much as $350 million to plug 32 wells and remove Platform Holly. Plugging the offshore wells, one at a time, will take up to three years, and the\u00a0platform cannot be removed until that work is finished.<\/span><\/p>\n Exxon sold Platform Holly to Venoco Inc. in 1997. But in 2017, two years after the Refugio Oil Spill, Venoco declared bankruptcy and quitclaimed its offshore leases to the state, leaving behind a meager $22 million bond for decommissioning.<\/span><\/p>\n A break in the Plains All American Pipeline, which transported Venoco\u2019s crude to refineries,\u00a0caused the spill, dumping 123,228\u00a0gallons of crude into the ocean at Refugio Beach. The pipeline remains shut down.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cVenoco walked away,\u201d said Linda Krop, chief counsel at the Environmental Defense Center, a Santa Barbara-based nonprofit group. \u201cNow they\u2019re leaving us and other oil companies to clean up their mess.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Onshore, Exxon contends it is not liable for removing Venoco\u2019s former oil and gas processing plant at Haskell\u2019s Beach, the Ellwood Onshore Facility. Negotiations are ongoing; the state\u2019s position is that the company has the responsibility to assume nearly all the costs related to the decommissioning work.<\/span><\/p>\n But taxpayers are already shouldering some of the expense. Under an agreement with the bankruptcy court, the state report says, State Lands is operating the onshore plant and Platform Holly at a cost of $1.2 million per month so that Exxon can safely plug the platform wells. Without somewhere to ship the oil and gas, the pressure in those wells would build up dangerously.<\/span><\/p>\n State Lands estimates it will cost up to $83 million to keep the plant and Platform Holly running for three years. That\u2019s equivalent to half the $160 million in revenues from royalties and rents that Venoco generated for the state there.<\/span><\/p>\n Goleta Mayor Paula Perotte is hoping her city will someday be able to create a park on the 4 acres where the former Venoco plant stands, a stone\u2019s throw from Haskell\u2019s Beach.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cThat\u2019s the goal,\u201d Perotte said. \u201cIt would be the city\u2019s first park on the beach. We all want that facility to be gone.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Venoco\u2019s bankruptcy also included platforms Gail and Grace, which lie in federal waters; and the Carpinteria Oil & Gas Plant. The plant is located on 55 acres on the Carpinteria Bluffs near a nature preserve, overlooking a harbor seal rookery.<\/span><\/p>\n Chevron, the company that sold the project to Venoco in 1999, has assumed responsibility for both onshore and offshore decommissioning. Looking ahead, the City of Carpinteria is considering whether to rezone the blufftop property for a park.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cA lot of us would hope that somehow we could acquire that space, which is really desirable, and create a parklike atmosphere along there,\u201d Shaw said.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n A 19th century bill comes due<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n Just up the coast in Summerland, no oil company can be held liable for the offshore legacy wells that are leaking onto the beach.<\/span><\/p>\n The wildcatters that stampeded the area in the late 1890s are long gone. In a kind of Gold Rush for oil, they erected the first offshore oil development in the United States \u2014 14 wooden drilling piers and 400 shallow wells \u2014 and abandoned the mess after a big storm in 1902.<\/span><\/p>\n In a 2018 report to the Legislature, State Lands estimates there are 200 \u201chigh priority legacy oil and gas wells that could, depending on their condition, leak oil into the marine environment \u2026\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Of these, 192 are off Summerland and eight are off Goleta, near Haskell\u2019s Beach.<\/span><\/p>\n In 2017, the Legislature authorized $20 million through 2028 to identify and plug legacy wells and remove coastal hazards, including old steel pilings and jetties.<\/span><\/p>\n State Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson, D-Santa Barbara, authored the legislation. Hurley\u2019s family foundation, the Manitou Fund, donated more than $100,000 to Heal the Ocean, a Santa Barbara nonprofit group, partly to address the legacy wells. Heal the Ocean commissioned dive and aerial surveys, and the aerial photos helped swing the vote.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cWe may not ever be able to cap all of the legacy wells,\u201d Jackson said last week.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cThey\u2019re all inexcusable, but some are creating greater problems close to shore. The bill for the last hundred years is finally coming due, and it is sadly not being paid by those who have defiled the landscape, the seascape and the coast. It will be paid by taxpayers.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n